Products and Roles to Review
First select the product to review from ArcoUSD, Savings and Funds, and define the institution’s role. Investment and holdings, external asset connections, liquidity provision, and app or API integration have distinct contractual and operating scopes. Where an institution performs several roles, its activities and approval scope are distinguished.
See Funds for the three existing DigiFT-linked products, eight products planned for onboarding, the parties’ roles and official materials. A listing or external cooperation announcement does not replace an individual institution’s participation approval or confirmation of an ARCO product’s contracts, custody or deployment.
Material Status and Links
The status below reflects the Docs as of 7 October 2026. A Docs publication date is distinct from a contract’s effective date, a holdings reference date or a security review date.Product Due Diligence Submission Fields
Each material records its product, network and class, actual responsible legal entities and roles, preparer and reviewer, reference date, version and effective date, update frequency and next review date, update owner and original URL. If an original has restricted access, its accessible scope and request route are provided. The preparation roles below identify responsibilities to assign; they do not state that a particular legal entity has already been assigned responsibility.
ArcoUSD’s T+0 to T+2 day reserve replenishment target, measured from the MMF recovery request date T, is a reserve operating target. It is not a payout commitment to an individual user or a redemption deadline for every product. Day-count conventions, external product business days and submission cutoffs, and applicable payout deadlines are defined in each product’s specifications and contracts.
Due diligence materials distinguish statuses such as design or draft, product-specific confirmation and supporting links required, and confirmed materials available, alongside the scope of the originals. External underlying product materials and public code alone do not confirm custody, guarantees, audits or a mainnet launch for the entire ARCO product.
Institutional Onboarding Stages
Define the responsible contacts, submission materials and approval conditions for the following stages according to the product and the institution’s role. Technical application of KYB, settlement and integration is reviewed separately from actual checks and contractual approvals, within their respective responsibility scopes.
Actual product-specific procedures and approving parties are confirmed in the onboarding specification. App listings and address allowlisting alone are not treated as completion of KYB or legal eligibility review.